ReviewEssays.com - Term Papers, Book Reports, Research Papers and College Essays
Search

Marx's Theory on the Fall of Capitalism

Essay by   •  December 31, 2010  •  Essay  •  1,442 Words (6 Pages)  •  2,018 Views

Essay Preview: Marx's Theory on the Fall of Capitalism

Report this essay
Page 1 of 6

Why did Karl Marx believe that capitalism would eventually collapse and be replaced by communism?

To what extent were his predictions confirmed by the history of the twentieth century?

Karl Marx is regarded by many as the first social scientist ever. Although it is argued that Adam Smith was the first great economist, and David Ricardo the first great modern economist, Marx is undoubtedly the economist that has had the biggest impact on economic history. It was he that masterminded the concept of a socialist utopia, which ultimately led to over a third of the world been ruled under the communist regime , a model that Marx concocted. Born on 5 May 1818, in Trier, one of Germany's oldest cities, Marx was the first economist who infused history, philosophy, economics, sociology and political theory all into his work. Marx was ahead of his time, his theories were ground breaking, only time would tell whether his predictions would come to fruition. Marx's main claim was that capitalism would eventually fall due to its own internal contradictions and faults, to be replaced by a socialist utopia, so to speak. Marx had many complex motives behind the eventual fall of capitalism, he delves in to great detail about these reasons in his masterpiece Capital (1867), in this text Marx writes about how the capitalist system will falter over time due to the way it operates. It is these faults of the capitalist system that are brought in to question when analysing an issue of this nature, what weaknesses did Marx identify in his writings and were these weaknesses evident in the capitalist system come the end of the twentieth century?

A major argument that Marx put across in his scripts was that capitalism would force society to polarise, causing two classes within society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. These classes were at both extremes of the social spectrum, the bourgeoisie been the rich "fat cats" who reeped the fruits of capitalism, they were normally the factory or land owners. The proletariat comprised of the working class, those who worked in the factories for the bourgeoisie, they were the majority of the population often living at a subsistence level, whilst the bourgeoisie were a minority of the population but occupied a large percentage of wealth within society. Marx believed that if ever profit was to be made it could only be made through the exploitation of the worker, the labour theory of value validates this point. In this theory Marx explains of how the value of a commodity can be measured by the amount of labour hours put into the production of that commodity. He argued that through capitalism the workers were been exploited for profit, this profit was known as the surplus value. Marx claimed that the surplus value was the basis upon which capitalism operated, he wrote in his critically acclaimed Capital "Without the production of the surplus value there can be no capitalist production, and hence no capital and no capitalism."(Marx, 1970, p.1005), he was confident that capitalism would crumble should the bourgeoisie stop exploiting the workers for profit. Through his work, Marx managed to put across the argument that if in a capitalist economy all goods are sold at a price that mirrored their true value, including labour itself, how were capitalists able to turn over profit, the only logical explanation was through the exploitation of the worker. This meant that the workers would be working harder or for more hours without their wages rising in proportion with the increase in the price of the good. Marx was a firm believer that the working class would become increasingly livid with the inequality within society. Whilst the workers standard of living was not increasing and they were working harder and harder, the bourgeoisie's would be constantly improving without them putting too much effort in, this inequality will ultimately be too much for the proletariat to handle, resulting in a social revolution.

The proletariat would not only be dissatisfied with the unequal pay according to Marx. He also believed that the working class would be despondent with their jobs. Workers would be wasted in their jobs as they would be doing the same thing on a day to day basis, his line of reasoning was that the workers were putting their jobs before their human needs. Marx believed that the worker would become a slave of the machine that they operated every day. In his Communist Manifesto, Marx wrote that the proletariat are "daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the overlooker, and above all, the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself" (Marx. K, Engels. F, p 15). If a worker had the same routine for years on end it would lead for him to start thinking that something needs to change, this was what Marx hoped would happen, that the worker would realise that he was just a tool for a system that did not care whether he prospered or not. With rising discontent, Marx believed that revolution would follow.

Marx was incorrect when saying that the workers would become alienated from the capitalist system due to all the above factors, in fact he couldn't of been more wrong. This point was one of the gaping errors in Marx's predictions, standards of living have massively increased for the working class since Marx wrote Capital (1867). The UK's GDP per person has increased from Ð'Ј3,191 to Ð'Ј19,030 from 1870 to 1999 (Maddison, 2001).

...

...

Download as:   txt (8.6 Kb)   pdf (110.7 Kb)   docx (12 Kb)  
Continue for 5 more pages »
Only available on ReviewEssays.com