On Hamlet's Delay

William Shakespeare, perhaps the greatest playwright of all time, authored a number of works consisting of sonnets, comedies, and tragedies. In his brilliant career, Shakespeare created literary works of art. What makes Shakespeare unlike any other writer of his time, or thereafter, is his ability to organize a realistic plot, manage themes, and develop characters within his works. As well, ShakespeareЎЇs ability to provoke feeling and reaction to his writing is also what sets him apart from other common writers.

Of his works, Hamlet is without question the most famous play in the English language. Probably written in 1601 or 1602, the tragedy is a milestone in Shakespeare's dramatic development; the playwright achieved artistic maturity in this work through his brilliant depiction of the hero's struggle with two opposing forces: moral integrity and the need to avenge his father's murder. Although four hundred years has passed, this tragedy has been sparkling with a peculiar beauty of its own. In Hamlet, Shakespeare wrote an incomparable profound tragedy of human spirit from a very common myth and vested the hero Hamlet with deep thoughts and emotions that many people possess. No wonder the famous writer Belinsky exclaimed: ÐŽoHamlet ÐŽ­ is really great and profound: this is life, this is human being, this is you, this is me, this is everyone of us.ÐŽ±

Hamlet was the young prince of Denmark. His uncle Claudius murdered the old King Hamlet, married the Queen and then became the new king. Early in the play the details of the murder become known to Hamlet, he vows to carry out his revenge, and eventually he does so, bringing the action to a close. But unlike common people who take revenge at the time of knowing the murder, he delayed to take action. Hamlet does not kill Claudius in church, while he has the best chance of doing so up until that point; He is known in the kingdom as a brilliant fencer, and shows his skill in the match with Laertes, after which he is able to cut the king and take the glass of poison from Horatio's hand, all that while dying of deadly poison. What then is the reason for his delay of action? This question has been the field for many literary critics' battles. No doubts, Hamlet had his own reason. And this should be connected with his character.

Hamlet's character shows much discouragement, earnestness, and sensitivity towards his newfound sorrows. While the main, and, most often, the only flaw that has been attributed to Hamlet is his delay. This seems to constitute the central part in Hamlet. Critics seem to cling to this detail, as if trying to save the status of Hamlet as a typical Elizabethan tragedy of revenge. By the definition of tragedy, there should exist a flaw in the character of the main hero, who is a great personality that is engaged in a struggle that ends catastrophically. If Hamlet had no flaw, what kind of tragic hero is he? No doubt, Hamlet is a tragical drama, for it has many characters ÐŽofrom the topÐŽ± ending up losing their lives. But the play wouldn't lose its tragic tone if Hamlet was an ideal hero instead of tragic one.

Hamlet was an unusual prince; his revenge was unusual as well. In order to illustrate this point, letЎЇs mention two other revengers in this play: Fortinbras and Laertes, both of whom have to avenge insults to or murder done on their fathers. They act immediately, with effective resolution and courage. Given that they are about the same age as Hamlet, it would seem that we are invited to see in Hamlet's response to his father's murder something quite different from what a normal prince with a sense of honour might do.

While, a careful reader can notice that more than two months pass between Hamlet being told by the Ghost about the evil deed, and Hamlet following through his plan. One can argue that from this follows that Hamlet procrastinated, having that one flaw - being passive, not daring to act.

If fact, Hamlet once wanted to take action when whole thing was clear, which can be seen from the following lines:

ÐŽoTis now the very witching time of night.

ÐŽ­ Now could I drink hot blood,

And do such bitter business as the day

Would quake to look on.ÐŽ±

It seems that he was about to take action, but he did not finally.

As in many conventional revenge dramas, Hamlet has external obstacles to overcome in order to carry out the revenge. There is a delay, but only because Hamlet is not in a situation where he can easily carry it out. He has to wait for an opportune moment. Hamlet has ready access to Claudius; he even meets him face to face in an unguarded momentЎЄat prayer, here is soliloquy:

ÐŽoNow might I do it pat, now he is praying,

And now IЎЇll do it. ЁC And so he goes to heaven;

And so am I revenged. That would be scannЎЇd.

A villain kills my father, and for that,

I, his sole son, do this same villain send

To heaven.

Oh, this is hire and salary, not revenge.

ÐŽ­

No!

Up, sword, and know thou a more horrid hent.ÐŽ±

Nothing happened finally, for Hamlet feared that ClaudiusЎЇ spirit should go to heaven, as a result, he missed the golden opportunity to take the revenge. It is difficult to imagine one's self as if he or she was Hamlet, and everyone contains a tinge of Hamlet in his feelings, wants, and worries, and proudly so, for Hamlet is not like the other tragic heroes of his period.

Hamlet tried several times, but he missed these opportunities. Hamlet is very brave and impulsive Prince, but the plot seems to prevent him from finding