Self-Enlargement in Raymond Carver's Cathedral
Essay by review • December 21, 2010 • Research Paper • 6,668 Words (27 Pages) • 3,261 Views
In "The Compartment," one of Raymond Carver's bleakest stories, a man passes through the French countryside in a train, en route to a rendezvous
with a son he has not seen for many years. "Now and then," the narrator says of the man, "Meyers saw a farmhouse and its outbuildings, everything surrounded by a wall. He thought this might be a good way to live-in an old house surrounded by a wall" (Cathedral 48). Due to a last minute change of heart, however, Meyers chooses to stay insulated in his "compartment" and, remaining on the train, reneges on his promise to the boy, walling out everything external to his selfish world, paternal obligation included.
Meyers's tendency toward insularity is not, of course, unique among the characters in Cathedral or among the
characters of earlier volumes. In Will You Be Quiet, Please? there is the paranoid self-cloistering of Slater and
Arnold Breit, and in What We Talk About When We Talk About Love we read of James Packer's cantankerous,self-absorbed disgruntlement about life's injustices. In Cathedral appear other, more extreme versions of insularity,from a husband's self-imposed confinement to a living room in "Preservation" to another's pathetic reluctance to leave an attic garret in "Careful." More strikingly in Cathedral than before, Carver's figures seal themselves off from their worlds, walling out the threatening forces in their lives even as they wall themselves in, retreating destructively into the claustrophobic inner enclosures of self. But corresponding to this new extreme of insularity, there are in several stories equally striking instances where--pushing insularity the other way--characters attempt to throw off their entrapping nets and, in a few instances, appear to succeed. In Cathedral, and in Cathedral only, we witness the rare moments of their comings out, a process of opening up in closed-down lives that comes across
in both the subjects and events of the stories and in the process of their telling, where self-disenfranchisement is
reflected even on the level of discourse, rhetorically or structurally, or both.
As one might expect, "de-insulation" of this kind necessarily involves the intervention of others: the coming out of
a self-enclosed figure depends upon the influence of another being--a baker or a babysitter or blind man, or even a
fellow drunk on the road to recovery, who, entering unexpectedly into a character's life, affords new perspective or
awareness and guides him along, if not toward insight then at least away from the destructively confining strictures
of self. As one might expect further, such interventions and influences are mobilized in the stories through the
communal gestures of language--through the exchanging of tales and through communicative transactions, particularly, where separate identities blend and collaborate rather than collide. Thus even as "Carver's task," as Paul Skenazy writes, is to depict the "tiny, damning confinements of the spirit," in Cathedral it is also to go beyond depicting the suffocations and wilted spirits of characters in chains (78). Engaging in what he calls a kind of writerly "opening up" of his own, Carver draws out in various uplifting moments the momentary gratifications and near-joys characters experience when, however temporarily, the enclosing walls come down--when their self-preoccupations lift and they sense new freedom, a freedom they may or may not ever truly participate in at all
(Interview 21).
But since outright freedom is for many of Carver's lot as terrifying as total lack of mobility (think of Arnold Breit
in "Are You a Doctor?" or Lloyd in "Careful"), the freedoms Carver's newly-liberated characters experience manifest themselves ironically as forms of enclosure, ample and humane as those enclosures may be. Be they a comforting memory of one's old bedroom, or the warm, fragrant reality of a bakery, or a vision of the awesome interior of a cathedral, they are enclosures nevertheless. Trying to free themselves of the fetters of insecurity and addiction, Carver's characters expand both inwardly and outwardly and, thanks to the beneficial incursion of other lives and other stories, imagine larger, more spacious enclosures--places big enough and light enough to allow the spirit room to breathe. In Cathedral, by and large, characters are more insulated than ever, cut off from their worlds and from themselves; but a few of them, like J. P. in "Where I'm Calling From," trying patiently and steadfastly "to
figure out how to get his life back on the track" (135), demonstrate through shared stories and through overtures
toward human connection new and unprecedented awareness. It is an awareness of collective confinement, a sense
that we can and often do help each other set aright our derailed lives, that by opening up to others and to ourselves,
we do indeed occasionally get those lives back on track.
"Where I'm Calling From" is the story of a man coming to grips with addiction within the security of an alcohol
treatment home. Contrary to the situations of "The Compartment," "Preservation," and "Careful"--situations in
which men blockade themselves in ways as offensive to others as they are self-destructive--this narrator's
confinement is both positive and necessary. Locking himself up voluntarily in "Frank Martin's drying out facility"
(127), he is a stronger version of Wes in "Chef's House," a wavering recoveree who lapses back into alcoholism
when his summer retreat--the sanctuary of his fragile recovery--falls out from under him. Up until now, this
narrator (like many of Carver's narrators, he goes unnamed) has insulated himself with drink, with the buffering
torpor
...
...