Social Status in Shakespeare's Plays

In Shakespeare's time, the English lived with a strong sense of social class -- of belonging to a particular group because of occupation, wealth, and ancestry. Elizabethan Society had a very strict social code at the time that Shakespeare was writing his plays. Social class could determine all sorts of things, from what a person could wear to where he could live to what jobs his children could get. Some families moved from one class to another, but most people were born into a particular class and stayed there. There was a chance of being granted a title by the crown. This was uncommon at the time and a relatively new thing for Europe where ancestry always defined nobility.

Shakespeare's plays show the different social statuses throughout England because of his audience. He had a variety of social classes that would attend his plays and go to the theater. Most of his plays have a way of identifying with whoever would be in the audience watching. Each different social class has a chance to relate to one of the characters in his plays. In Alls Well That Ends Well, it is the working class that would be able to relate to Helen's problem. She is the product of a working class family, and therefore thought to be below the nobility. She wasn't born from a great titled family that has had its name for centuries therefore she is not equal to Bertram.

The play, As You Like It, deals with the Elizabethan social status among the nobility. This play has a lot to do with the act of primogeniture. This play shows that even if people were born of the nobility there was still the chance that they weren't as good as the rest of the nobility. The second born sons and daughters of the nobility weren't as important as the first born sons. It was the first born sons that inherited the titles, or they would have to be given to the husband of the daughter. The general audience was that of gentler born younger sons, adults as well as the youths that were still apprentices or students in school. This play opens up with a fight between siblings because of social hierarchy causing them to be put at odds. Primogeniture was not a binding law but rather a flexible social custom in which the propertied sough to perpetuate themselves by preserving their estates intact through successive generations. His play shows that even if they are born within the nobility they are still beneath those that come before them.

Orlando is alienated from the life of being a landed gentleman. This then intensifies the conflicts between siblings, older and younger brother. This also shows the major division in society between the landed and the unlanded, also known as the gentry and the commoners. I also believe that primogeniture complicates not only sibling rivalry, but the relationships between father and sons. The eldest son is impatient to get his rightful inheritance, while the younger sons are resentful that they are receiving nothing from their fathers. Shakespeare's plays are loaded with subjects, sons and younger brothers who are undecided as to how they should feel about their role in life. They are bound to the people that are better than them on a socio-economic level, but resent the fact. This play gave people a chance to see someone that had sunk in social class get a chance to rise up, which never really happened during this time. Shakespeare used this ploy to really captivate his audience's attention, while also I believe making fun of society as it was.

The working class in, Alls Well That Ends Well, and the second born son of, As You Like It, isn't very different. The second born sons are sent off to schools to become apprentices, clergymen, or merchants in the working class. The second born sons aren't viewed with the same amount of disdain because they are still of noble birth, but they are left to do the same jobs as the people born into the working class. It is the plight of both of these characters, Helen and Orlando, which calls to the audience. The members of the audience can relate in some way to what both of these characters are going through.

Shakespeare's plays explore the difficulty or impossibility of establishing or authenticating a self in a rigorously hierarchical and patriarchal society. The fact that the people were born into what social class they had to live in leaves them from exploring themselves and potential. They are only allowed to aspire so high, and that defeats the purpose of find oneself because they are told what they are going to be. Shakespeare questions the rigidity of social class in the play, Alls Well That Ends Well, because he portrays Helen as being equal to Bertram because of deed and not birth. The King sees nothing wrong with Helen picking someone to marry that is high above her in social standing. He's even willing to grant her a title to make her equal to Bertram. The King says it is just Helen's status that Bertram disdains, but I'm not sure if it is.

I think in this case that Bertram is more worried about tainted blood entering his family. The nobility only married the nobility because of the fact that their blood was considered to be more pure and clean. In the case of Helen she was of the working class which meant her blood wasn't of the pure and clean type that she was a base commoner. Nobility didn't like to think that their blood should be mixed with that of the commoners and the lower classes. At least not in the case of the first born sons or the daughters of the nobility.

In the case of social identities being formed in Shakespeare's plays I feel as though he's just portraying what society was like. He dramatizes the truth so that people actually take the time to look as it and see that what he's saying is true. We consider these plays comedies, but in truth they were a reenactment of what people were living everyday. Elizabethan society was a rigid society based on customs passed down from century to century. The characters in all of Shakespeare's plays represented different social identities that were in the audience of his plays. People were born into their place in society and that was the end of it. Shakespeare's plays show the Elizabethan society in a way that we find comical, but if actually looked into true.

In, A Midsummer Night's Dream, Hermia is being forced to wed against her will because of her father. Society's rules states that Hermia isn't allowed to choose her own husband because she is female. Females in the Elizabethan society were the lowest people no matter what class they were in. The nobility gave their daughters no choice as to what their futures would entail. They were raised to make good marriages that would benefit their family and hopefully social standing. Hermia's father goes to the