Alexander the Great

Progress is the advancement or movement toward a goal, or to a further or higher state. This is a principle that Alexander of Macedon applied to his age of reign. Alexander of Macedon is commonly referred to as Alexander the Great. He is considered one of the most successful military commanders in history. He was born in 356 and reigned from 336 - 323 B.C.E, succeeding his father, King Philip 2nd of Macedon. Alexander inherited Philip's goal to invade Persia and gain expansion. He showed progress through this expansion of his empire and conquering the different lands to create a more beneficial and superior civilization than the one he succeeded. Alexander's empire reached from Macedonia to the Indus River entering Punjab. Alexander proclaimed himself as a king and a son of Zeus, as the manifestation of the Egyptian, Ammon. He became an inspiration for conquerors after him, such as Napoleon, Pompey, Caesar, and Hannibal. Alexander's contributions made a profound impact on world civilizations and cultures through the expansion of territories and the integration of those cultures, through long distance trading, which became a prominent feature, and the spread of beliefs, religions, and values reaching great distances, all of which have been considered historic due its importance and longevity. His contributions are what qualifies him as a leader. He not only led the common people and an army, but he also led a movement. Alexander's experiences and policies had immediate and long-term effects as it shaped individuals and communities as a whole.

Why is Alexander The Great qualifies as a leader and why is his contributions must be regarded as historic .The values were to be realized by Phillip’s most famous memorial, his son Alexander the great, who took the dynamic of glory, gain and conquest to unprecedented lengths. Born in July 356B.C, Alexander the great succeeded his murdered father in 336B.C; five years later, aged twenty five, he had conquered the great armies of the Persian king in Asia and had taken over the palaces treasures of the Persian empire which were more than two hundred years old. He never lost a battle and his minor campaigns were masterpieces of audacity and hardly credible stamina. He was lethal up an Indian mountain peak or alone in a Lebanese forest.

He led his men from front, although this inspiring habit nearly killed him in 325 BC when he jumped down off a city wall in infia single handedly into a terrified crowd of Indian archers. He took the island city of Thebes, Phillips uneasy ally, and sold the inhabitants into slavery. Alexander the great could trick opponents by a series of stratagems; Alexander was a master of what military theorists now teach as dynamic maneuvers. Alexander could split his forces and coordinate them in planned campaign. Alexander the great was cool enough to take huge risk but intelligent enough to adapt them to the weak points of his ever changing enemies.

He also helped his progress by an appropriate political �spin’. Alexander’s bold impulsive nature owed much to his extreme youth. It was enhanced, however, by two singular supports. His father Phillip had given him a good Greek education shared with the young sons of Macedonian nobles, Phillip’s newly formed corps of royal pages, who became Alexander’s supporting officer. The pupil of Aristotle, Alexander read