Americas Involvement in World War 2

Americas involvement in World War Two

When war broke out , there was no way the world could possibly know the severity of this guerre.

Fortunately one country saw and understood that Germany and its allies would have to be stopped.

America's Involvement in World War two not only contributed in the eventual downfall of the insane

Adolph Hitler and his Third Reich, but also came at the precise time and moment. Had the united states

entered the war any earlier the consequences might have been worse.

Over the years it has been an often heated and debated issue on whether the united states could

have entered the war sooner and thus have saved many lives. To try to understand this we must look both

at the people's and government's point of view.

Just after war broke out in Europe, President Roosevelt hurriedly called his cabinet and military

advisors together. There it was agreed that the United states stay neutral in these affairs. One of the

reasons given was that unless America was directly threatened they had no reason to be involved. This

reason was a valid one because it was the American policy to stay neutral in any affairs not having to with

them unless American soil was threatened directly. Thus the provisional neutrality act passed the senate

by seventy-nine votes to two in 1935. On August 31, Roosevelt signed it into law. In 1936 the law was

renewed, and in 1937 a "comprehensive and permanent" neutrality act was passed (Overy 259).

The desire to avoid "foreign entanglements" of all kinds had been an American foreign policy for

more than a century. A very real "geographical Isolation" permitted the United States to "fill up the empty

lands of North America free from the threat of foreign conflict"(Churchill 563).

Even if Roosevelt had wanted to do more in this European crisis (which he did not), there was a

factor too often ignored by critics of American policy-American military weakness. When asked to

evaluate how many troops were available if and when the United States would get involved, the army

could only gather a mere one hundred thousand, when the French, Russian and Japanese armies

numbered in millions. Its weapons dated from the first World War and were no match compared to the

new artillery that Germany and its allies had. "American soldiers were more at home with the horse than

with the tank" (Overy 273). The air force was just as bad if not worse. In September 1939 the Air Corps

had only 800 combat aircraft

again compared with Germany's 3600 and Russia's 10,000 . American

military Aviation (AMA) in 1938 was able to produce only 1,800, 300 less than Germany, and 1,400 less

than Japan. Major Eisenhower, who was later Supreme commander of the Allied forces in the second

World War, complained that America was left with "only a shell of military establishment" (Chapman

234 ). As was evident to Roosevelt the United states military was in no way prepared to enter this

European crisis.

Another aspect that we have to consider is the people's views and thought's regarding the

United States going to war. After all let us not forget that the American government is there "for the

people and by the people" and therefore the people's view did play a major role in this declaration of

Neutrality. In one of Roosevelt's fireside chats he said "We shun political commitments which might

entangle us In foreign wars...If we face the choice of profits or peace-this nation must answer, the nation

will answer 'we choose peace' ",in which they did. A poll taken in 1939 revealed that ninety-four per

cent of the citizens did not want the united states to enter the war. The shock of World War one had still

not left ,and entering a new war, they felt, would be foolish. In the early stages of the war American

Ambassador to London was quoted saying "It's the end of the world, the end of everything" ( Overy 261).

As Richard Overy notes in The Road To War, this growing "estrangement" from Europe was not mere

selfishness. They were the values expressed by secretary of state, Cordel Hull: "a primary interest in peace

with justice, in economic well-being with stability, and conditions of order under the law". These were

principles here on which most Americans (ninety-four percent as of 1939) agreed on. To promote these

principles the United States would have to avoid all "foreign entanglements", or as Overy puts it "any

kind of alliance or association outside the western hemisphere". Instead the United States should act as an

arbitre in world affairs, "encouraging peaceful change where necessary" and most and for all discouraging

aggression (Overy 263).

Why risk going to war, when it is contrary to American policy which most if not all Americans

were in agreement with and not mentioning the fact that the American