Argument: Euthanasia

Argument: Euthanasia

Euthanasia derives from the Greak for a "good death". Euthanasia is practice of mercifully ending a person's life in order to release the person from an incurable disease, intolerable suffering, or undignified death. This essay will show that the negatives outweigh the benefits for a number of reasons.

The first and most important reason to oppose the euthanasia is that infringe humanism. Some opposers to euthanasia claim that because humanism implies the overriding value of human lives over all other things, physicians committed to humanism should always try to save life, but never involve in any killing, either euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide. In fact, humanism is an ambiguous concept, and the value varies in different groups, however, euthanasia break the basic value of humanism.

Next, saving patients is responsibility of doctors. Every doctor and nurse has an obligation to resuscitate people and keep them alive even when there is no hope to recovery. In these circumstances, the patient maybe still pain, have an unacceptable quality of life, or be in a vegetative state. But the advance in medical technology is able to keep these patients alive.

Finally, some people object to legalize euthanasia all over the world because they are afraid that it will cause social instability. According to their view, if euthanasia were legalized, many people would be upset and dissatisfied with the society, thereby social solidarity and stability would be undermined.

In conclusion, euthanasia damages the basic value of doctors and regional culture, furthermore, in some circumstance; it probably leads to specific social problems. All in all, the government should legalize to ban euthanasia, or the crisis will not be far from our community.