Branches of Goverment

Branches of Government

Each branch of government is controlled by the other two in several ways. The legislative, judicial and executive branches are important parts of government to many Americans. For example, if congress passes a law, the president may veto because of his executive power within the United States government. Congress can override that veto with a vote of two-thirds of both houses. The forefathers divided the government into three parts, or branches: what were the reasons will be detailed. With the division of power presently, does it create obstacles to enactment or passing of important legislation? Within this discussion also, it will be characterized that conflict between supporters of a strong federal government and champions of states' right in the past until now. THESIS-please remove

At the beginning the creation of the constitution there was much debate and disagreement about the separating the powers of government into three branches. During the late 1700's the various differences on why powers should not be given to one man or a group of men. Those differences assisted the forefathers to construct the three branches of government. The branches each have a different purpose the legislature known to making the laws, and the executive branch lead by the President enforces the laws, and a judiciary under the U.S. laws decides cases. But the forming of the three branches and its division of power has created obstacles to enactment or passing of important legislation from time to time. Each branch had it own set of rules was an obstacle, for example the judiciary branch was noted that members of the Supreme Court were selected for life , with the removal of the Chief Just or associate justices is way of death, impeachment or resignation. With the majority votes of the Supreme Court, its decisions are made final; when it finds that laws or policies of Congress and governing bodies of states are in violation of the U.S. Constitution. An obstacle was that President Roosevelt found the judiciary branch burdensome to the fact that the justices could veto legislation that clearly had the support of the vast majority of the public("Supreme Court", n.d.). During this period of the 1930's several many critics questioned the judicial review decision making process itself. As a result of criticism, several amendments to the Constitution