ReviewEssays.com - Term Papers, Book Reports, Research Papers and College Essays
Search

Flat Tax Pro

Essay by   •  February 18, 2011  •  Essay  •  533 Words (3 Pages)  •  1,078 Views

Essay Preview: Flat Tax Pro

Report this essay
Page 1 of 3

Imagine yourself a hard working citizen of the U.S, working overtime and advancing in your career. You get punished by the IRS because you don't lead a sedentary lifestyle. What lesson does this teach, are we supposed to be lazy?

The current system established in 1913 by a constitutional amendment, has become outdated. Furthermore, it is an infeasible, unenforceable morass.

Every good economist, conservative or liberal, from Keynes to Lockwood, has agreed on the three principles of good taxation: Simplicity, Equity, and Efficiency

When it comes to Simplicity, we can all agree that the current tax code, with over 480 forms and 8 billion pages of codified law, is anything but simple. In fact, each year, it takes over 5.8 Billion taxpayer hours to comply. In fact, the Flat Tax has often been referred to as the "Post card" tax system because filing returns would be on 2 postcard sized forms once a year.

The second principal is Equity. The current system obviously is unfair because it punishes a person for making good decisions and working hard. This tax would also eliminate the unfair system of multiple taxation. We are taxed when we save, when we buy, when we earn, and even when we die. Moreover, the premise that one should be penalized for making money is un-American and economically costly. Why should one be punished by being taxed at a higher rate because they have an extra job or because they work overtime on Saturdays? Hard work is an American value, and we should embrace it, not punish it.

The final principal of good taxation is Efficiency. Once again, the Flat Tax is the best alternative to the current system, which again fails to meet a principal of good taxation. With a Flat Tax, Administrative costs, Compliance costs, and economic distortions are all reduced. According to Rep. John Linder (R-GA). Costs for enforcing the code would be reduced by 25-35%.

In addition the IRS, the agency with portfolio for enforcing the tax code is incorrect more than 51% of the time. As far as compliance costs, they would be reduced significantly, which is greatly needed, as they are at $250 Billion with the current system. Finally, we will be able to better gauge the economy, with the Flat Tax, as it aides us in better monitoring the growth of the middle class, which is the best indicator of the economy.

...

...

Download as:   txt (3.1 Kb)   pdf (64.8 Kb)   docx (10 Kb)  
Continue for 2 more pages »
Only available on ReviewEssays.com