Gdsfsd

dsfsCitain this January to take part in a seminar entitled "Building Bridges: Overcoming Obstacles in Christian-Muslim Relations". Tony Blair also praised these Christians and Muslims for coming together at the conference being hosted by the Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, to promote post-September 11 dialogue. The is same George Carey who in November 2000 said he believed the use of military force, which has resulted in the murder of tens of thousands of Muslim lives in Afghanistan, was necessary". Opening the two day seminar at Lambeth Palace, the mischievous globe trotting prime minister of Britain hailed the growing significance of inter-faith dialogue as a contribution to solving world conflicts and defeating "warped and perverted" religious extremism. "Dialogue finds its echo in the wider community where people do not have the understanding that they should have of the common values, heritage and traditions that unite faiths," he told the Muslim and Christian attendees. Those present, included from the Muslims Prince Hassan of Jordan, and Mustafa Ceric, the Grand Mufti of Bosnia. The meetings were in private and their deliberations are not expected to be made public for some time. The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr George Carey, is also to sign an agreement with the Grand Imam of al-Azhar al-Sharif, Dr Mohamed Sayed Tantawy as part of another programme of dialogue between Anglicans and Muslims. The signing will take place during a ceremony at Lambeth Palace on January 30th. To establish " brotherly relations" the agreement states. The idea of interfaith dialogue: The idea of interfaith dialogue which is being circulated nowadays, is a foreign, evil and western idea which has no basis in Islam. This is because it calls for mutual partnership between religions. So it calls for a new fabricated religion which the Muslims will profess instead of Islam because the advocates and those who call for this idea are the western kuffar themselves. This idea is not a new one but started internationally in 1932 when France sent representatives to negotiate with the men and scholars of al-Azhar about the idea of uniting the three religions; Islam, Christianity and Judaism. After the failure of Kafir westerners in distancing the Muslims from their Ð''Aqeedah via the missionaries, orientalists, cultural works, the media intellectual and political deception, they resorted to official ways in their countries and the in the countries of their agents. They began to hold conferences and seminars and establishing centres of study in their country and in the Muslim lands like the Oxford centre for Islamic studies, the Centre for Middle Eastern studies in the British university of Durham, the American college of the Holy Cross, Rabita the royal academy for the study of Islamic culture, the university of Aal al-Bayt and the World Council of Churches etc. They deliberately used terminologies and shiny general expressions which indicate meanings which are not defined in order to mislead and deceive. Some examples of which are: regeneration, opening up to the world, human civilisation, universal sciences, the need to have peaceful coexistence, discarding partisanship and extremism, globalism etc. They mixed the concept of science and culture, and culture and civilisation in order to take this confusion as justification to attack those holding onto their specific way of life by saying that they are against science and against the civilisation arising from it and accused them of being reactionary and backward. Though the issue in Islam is not as they claim. Islam, opens its gates to science and the civilisation that arises from this science and it closes them in the face of any culture or civilisation that is other than the culture and civilisation of Islam, because they constitute thoughts and concepts related to the behaviour of the human being, which has to be controlled by the Islamic concepts about life. And they paint certain capitalist thoughts in glowing tones to the Muslims and they sell them by saying that they do not contradict Islam until some Muslims considered them as being from Islam. Like Democracy, freedom, pluralism, socialism and others. While they denounce certain Islamic thoughts and describe them as uncivilised and not fit for this age, such as Jihaad, the Hudood, polygyny and other shari'a rules. And they subjected the study of the Islamic texts to the capitalist way of thinking which makes the reality the source of the rule and not the subject of the thought. And makes benefit the criterion in adopting or leaving the rule and not the Halaal and the Haraam. Which pushed some Muslims to invent certain principles which do not rely on the Shari'a texts to understand Islam. Like: the Fiqh of the reality, the Fiqh of balances, necessity permits the prohibited things and others. Which has resulted in the dilution of certain rules of Islam and the non-differentiation between the foreign rule from the original rule. And between what constitutes Kufr and what constitutes Islam. Thus Riba (usury) has become permitted and martyrdom has become suicide. The Kuffar who are supervising the dialogue are embarking on the generalisation and widening of the scope of the dialogue. So it will not remain restricted to a few in the conferences and seminars. Rather it must include all sections of society from the men, women, educated and labourers/workers. This is done via the universities, institutes of study, parties and associations and by attaching the western civilisation in economy, social sphere, politics, education etc. Thus, capitalism - according to their claim- is humane, rational, freedom and democracy. It is the new and successful culture. As for Islam it is blind faith, despotism, heritage. And it is the rule of religion, which accepts slavery and polygyny. It is an uncivilised/barbaric religion! The true viewpoint of the West towards Islam: Indeed the West, which calls for dialogue with the Muslims and heads conferences of dialogue, views Islam as an enemy. This viewpoint is the motive for the dialogue and this viewpoint governs and directs the dialogue. Thus the encyclopaedia of French culture which is the reference for every researcher states that the Messenger Muhammad (saw) is: a killer, antichrist, kidnaps women and the greatest enemy to the human mind'. Like wise most of the text books in Western Europe describe the Messenger Muhammad (saw), Islam and the Muslims with most ugliest of descriptions. Recently, the following has been mentioned in the book Ð''The End of History' of the American thinker Fukiyama:'the Capitalist system is the eternal salvation for man on earth. And that Islam despite its weakness and disintegration, threatens this new victorious way of life (i.e. capitalism)'. The former General Secretary of NATO (Javier Solana): Ð''Fundamentalist