Homosexuals in the Military

Homosexuals in the Military

The United States is one of the last original NATO countries to still ban gays from the military. For years, homosexuals have been denied the right to openly serve America. In this country, just as a man should not be judged by his race, he also should not he be judged by his sexual orientation. In 1990 a survey had been taken and results showed the country consisted of 15% homosexuals. Researchers say this percentage will show an upward curve due to the fact many gays are still very modest about their sexual preference. With such high amount of homosexuals, how could the military declare its exclusion policy on gays moral? Through the years, actions have been made to minimize discrimination within the military, but the ban has yet to be completely lifted. I feel that this is a very important topic, it shows that as much as we deny it, there is still ignorance, separation, and discrimination in this country. Think back to a time when you were discriminated against and felt isolated. Do you remember what a horrible feeling it was? Now imagine how large amounts of American soldiers feel when they are being singled out because of their sexual preference.

In previous years homosexuality was forbidden in the military, though not much has changed, today we have more laws to protect homosexuality. In the early twentieth century homosexuality was considered a crime. People were sentenced to as long as five years. During these times, there were no laws to protect homosexuals in the service. The government issued psychological exams in order to weed out any homosexuals. This put Gays in an awkward position because they only had two choices. They could lie and deny their sexual preference or, admit to their feelings and be sent home in embarrassment and disgrace.

In 1975 one brave man, Sergeant Leonard Matlovich challenged the system. Matlovich was an honorable soldier who served in Vietnam and received multiple awards. He had received the Purple Heart, two Air Force Commendation medals, as well as a Bronze Star for his outstanding distinguished service. In March of 1975, he wrote a letter stating "I consider myself to be a homosexual and fully qualified for further military service" (Oliver 61). Months following he was notified the armed forces were taking action to discharge him from the service. Despite his efforts to take action against the military, he was still discharged under the pretense of him being unfit for service. He then took a further step and brought his situation to federal court. "Although there is no specific guarantee of privacy in the United States Constitution, the right to be left alone is protected in the Fourth, Fifth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments" (Oliver 62). The action the military took was therefore violating his rights. Matlovich fought to be reinstated into the service, eventually his wish was granted. They re-offered him his position, as well as money back for lost time. He declined and settled for a cash settlement. From this point on many other men and woman in uniform have as well stood up to the government and fought their discharges as well. Sergeant Leonard Matlovich paved a way for many homosexuals in the military who were being robbed of their rights.1

When former president Bill Clinton came to office, he seemed eager and committed to lifting the ban on gays in the military. Numerous heterosexual members of the military voiced their complaints, stating homosexuals were unfit to serve. In order to satisfy both sides of the issue Clinton passed the "Don't ask, Don't tell, Don't pursue, Don't harass" policy. This policy gives homosexuals the right to serve the country as long as they do not show or speak of their sexual preference. They must keep their sexual orientation a secret at all times and refrain from any physical contact with a person of the same gender. The military is banned from asking about ones sexual orientation, and restrictions have been put on those of higher rankings when investigating any possibility of a service member being gay. Though this gave gays a way to finally become part of the military forces it still didn't give them the total rights they deserved. Clinton received much criticism for his decisions.

In 1996 a study was released by the Service members Legal Defense Network that 722 soldiers were discharged on the account of homosexuality. The SLDN stated that only 363 violated Clinton's new policy.2 This goes to show that even after Clinton's efforts to create equality within the military, homosexuals are still being discriminated against. Clearly, the military is hurting itself by increasing the discharges of homosexual service members. The services have already been faced with recruitment shortages. "The Government Accountability Office reported last week that the military has fired 322 language specialists in 1993, including 54 who specialized in Arabic"(Petry 58) These are crucial positions during this present time. The army is short linguistic specialists, the last thing they should be doing is discharging valuable soldiers who are fluent in other languages. By discharging large amounts of homosexuals, our forces are only losing more soldiers who are eager and ready to serve our great nation.

The Don't ask, Don't tell policy wastes millions of dollars each year. On average taxpayers spend $191 million to train and replace