Internet Explorer Ssl Vulnerability
Essay by review • October 20, 2010 • Essay • 743 Words (3 Pages) • 1,694 Views
Exploit Available: http://www.thoughtcrime.org/ie.html
From moxie@thoughtcrime.org Tue Aug 6 13:42:57 2002
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 16:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mike Benham
To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Subject: IE SSL Vulnerability
========================================================================
Internet Explorer SSL Vulnerability 08/05/02
Mike Benham
http://www.thoughtcrime.org
========================================================================
Abstract
Internet Explorer's implementation of SSL contains a vulnerability that
allows for an active, undetected, man in the middle attack. No dialogs
are shown, no warnings are given.
========================================================================
Description
In the normal case, the administrator of a web site might wish to provide
secure communication via SSL. To do so, the administrator generates a
certificate and has it signed by a Certificate Authority. The generated
certificate should list the URL of the secure web site in the Common Name
field of the Distinguished Name section.
The CA verifies that the administrator legitimately owns the URL in the CN
field, signs the certificate, and gives it back. Assuming the
administrator is trying to secure www.thoughtcrime.org, we now have the
following certificate structure:
[CERT - Issuer: VeriSign / Subject: VeriSign]
-> [CERT - Issuer: VeriSign / Subject: www.thoughtcrime.org]
When a web browser receives this, it should verify that the CN field
matches the domain it just connected to, and that it's signed using a
known CA certificate. No man in the middle attack is possible because it
should not be possible to substitute a certificate with a valid CN and a
valid signature.
However, there is a slightly more complicated scenario. Sometimes it is
convenient to delegate signing authority to more localized authorities.
In this case, the administrator of www.thoughtcrime.org would get a chain
of certificates from the localized authority:
[Issuer: VeriSign / Subject: VeriSign]
-> [Issuer: VeriSign / Subject: Intermediate CA]
-> [Issuer: Intermediate CA / Subject: www.thoughtcrime.org]
When a web browser receives this, it should verify that the CN field of
the leaf certificate matches the domain it just connected to, that it's
signed by the intermediate CA, and that the intermediate CA is signed by a
known CA certificate. Finally, the web browser should also check that all
intermediate certificates have valid CA Basic Constraints.
You guessed it, Internet Explorer does not check the Basic Constraints.
==========================================================================
Exploit
So what does this mean? This means that as far as IE is concerned, anyone
with a valid CA-signed certificate for ANY domain can generate a valid
CA-signed certificate for ANY OTHER domain.
As the unscrupulous administrator of www.thoughtcrime.org, I can generate
a valid certificate and request a signature from VeriSign:
[CERT - Issuer: VeriSign / Subject: VeriSign]
-> [CERT - Issuer: VeriSign / Subject: www.thoughtcrime.org]
Then I generate a certificate for any domain I want, and sign it using my
run-of-the-mill joe-blow CA-signed certificate:
[CERT - Issuer: VeriSign / Subject: VeriSign]
-> [CERT - Issuer: VeriSign / Subject: www.thoughtcrime.org]
-> [CERT - Issuer: www.thoughtcrime.org / Subject: www.amazon.com]
Since IE doesn't check the Basic Constraints on the www.thoughtcrime.org
certificate, it accepts this certificate chain as valid for
www.amazon.com.
Anyone with any
...
...