Interpretation: Yom

Genesis one uses the Hebrew word "Yom" in many cases. This words definition has been debated for centuries and even today its definition holds great impact on not only the interpretation of Genesis 1 but also the entire bible.

The bible is inspired by God and penned by humans. Those who believe this believe that the bible is truth and the words contained within are as well. With this said, the Hebrew word "Yom" must have a definition true to what God actually did and line up with the rest of scripture.

Two definitions commonly used for "Yom" are: a literal 24 hour period, or, a long period of time (Arnold, 23). Which of these definitions is correct? And even more importantly, how do the different definitions impact the interpretation of Genesis one?

I believe the Hebrew word "Yom" should be defined as a literal 24 hour day, and if we attempt to define it otherwise, in this context, we cut the thread that holds the credibility of the bible together.

The writer of Genesis one uses "evening" and "morning" to explain God's creation. When these words are used along with "Yom" in other Old Testament Scripture, such as Exodus 27:21, it always applies a literal day (Grigg). The writer describes the day "as composed of its literal parts, 'morning' and 'evening'" (Grigg).

Also, the first reference to day, in Genesis 1:5 is used in context of a full rotation of the earth; "And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day." This also implies that it was a literal 24 hour day.

Looking at the ten commandments given to Moses, the fourth says, "Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy... for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day..." (Exodus 20:8 & 11, KJV). This implies that the basis for our week is modeled after the creation week. Here the same word is interpreted as a literal 24 hour day.

Believing the concept of a 24 hour literal day may take a lot of faith, however, believing it as a "long time" doesn't take any less. If "Yom" is defined as a long time than the vegetation created on the third "long time" would be dead by the time the sun was created on the fourth. If one believes that God can keep this vegetation alive for this long time, is it so hard to believe that He could create in six literal days?

The debate continually arises about the earth being 4.59 billion years old (Ross, 29) and therefore if the earth was created in 6 literal days than the earth would be much younger. However, one has to realize that everything created upon the earth was created with the appearance of age. Man was not created as a baby, animals were not either. Therefore, is it so hard to assume that God also created the earth with the appearance of age?

What do these interpretations