James Adams on the French Revolution

When it comes to the events in France I am, in all honesty, torn. While I must admit that I understand the reasons for the revolution, and that France's people are being oppressed; and while I hope that the French revolution will result in liberty, equity, and humanity, I must admit that I am hesitant to fully agree with the uprising.

In revolutions, the most fiery spirits and flighty geniuses frequently obtain more influence than men of sense and judgment; and the weakest man may carry foolish measures in opposition to wise ones proposed by the ablest. France is in great danger. I, for one, can only see this revolution ending in chaos, horror, and ultimate tyranny. (1)

By destroying those who oppress them, they have liberated themselves in a sense, yes; however, after having slaughtered their leaders, they will have no one to turn to. There will be no one to offer steady direction, and what they saw as oppression before will simply become a mob-like anarchy. There's no question that they will annihilate and demolish the system they loathe; however, what will be built in the old regime's place?

Mr. Jefferson sees this as a new day for France; and, despite our differences on most issues, I'm inclined to agree. However, while there will be a violent change and disposing of tyrannical forces, I simply cannot see how, after the destruction, French will be able to build herself back up. Because they won't be able to build themselves, I see the French as angry people with no solid foundation, and I simply cannot find it in myself to trust them. One merely has to reflect on the dark base of human nature to understand why. Therefore, it's obvious that, while we can hope for them to succeed, we must avoid entangling ourselves with their ways and politics.

1: David McCullough, John Adams