ReviewEssays.com - Term Papers, Book Reports, Research Papers and College Essays
Search

Management Practices of Russia, Germany, Uk, Usa, China, Japan, Brazil, India and France

Essay by   •  June 30, 2017  •  Essay  •  1,389 Words (6 Pages)  •  1,326 Views

Essay Preview: Management Practices of Russia, Germany, Uk, Usa, China, Japan, Brazil, India and France

Report this essay
Page 1 of 6

Management Practices of

Russia, Germany, UK, USA, China, Japan, Brazil, India and France

Russia

The Russian administration has a high tendency to be in order and unity. The manager is required to issue guidelines for subordinates to the roles the take in the organisation. There is a scope of less or minimum counsel from managers to the subordinates in the organization order. An increase in the counsel can be seen as an indication of weak and absence of unity and order conclusiveness. The Subordinates have all control over the style and the method of important choices leading to decentralisation making the chiefs less control. The most influential centre directors make it to the top are the ones who have done a skill or a course to the chief which is at the top level of association. There is absolutely no or say little point in wasting time discussing or having a word with centre supervisors who don’t have effective access to the top level of management. the chief is expected to assign the work or the agenda with clear direction to the subordinates, the subordinates are relied to perform as per as the assigned work with absolutely near zero examination. There is a strong check on the age of the chiefs.

Japan

In japan the management principles are as follows: The Japanese management the works belong to a group and they perform each task as group. They don’t follow the star performer system as individual analysis is not important and are judged mostly as a team, they follows a strong respect to the person of authority. They also have strong work culture and high discipline to work. They also decline vacations and sick holidays to do the work. The Japanese management expect the employees to provide suggestions to increase operational efficiency which helps to increase organisation productivity. The management also views the human resources as the most important resources in the organisation. The Japanese management gives very high importance to incentive system and employee recognition in cash and kind.th management is also more focused on long run completive strategies than short run financial performance. They take the concept of continuous improvement (kaizen) very seriously.in the area of resource management or inventory management they are known to follow the just in time(JIT or Kanban) method.

Germany

The establishment of management principles of Germany dates back to the World War 1 era leading to a distinctive style and culture. The German management are appeared to be more formal and having strong rooted polices. The management is more sensitive to the external factors like the government standards, regulation and policy. The German mangers show various characteristics like strong leadership, strong technical background, product service and quality taken very seriously, strong emphasis on customer satisfaction, strong employee-employer relationship and strong cooperation and coordination with government body and regulators. The managers don’t seek the subordinates for opinions. The subordinates are also comfortable complying with decisions. The German management is known to work in teams and collaborate well through hierarchical lines. The role allocation in the team is clear defined and subordinates take greater responsibility for their individual task than for the entire group as a whole.

France

French management have stong emphasizes on gentleness and formality. The top level management mostly come from a select set of universities and share similar background. The French management is developing intercultural adaptability and readiness to change as they have medium tolerance towards it. The management looks for new innovations to have a historical data stating the benefits. The French management has stringent time culture, missing deadlines are portrayed as poor state of management, and inefficiency and effecting inter employee confidence. The decision making process is done mostly by the top level management often without seeking the opinions of the subordinates. The French management is known for working in teams and collaborating very well. The teams are advised to avoid confrontential behaviour and and high pressure tactics as it can be counterproductive. The teams are advised to take the help of the interpreter to avoid cultural misunderstanding.

China

Most of the Chinese companies are state owned while a small portion of them are owned by the private body. The top level management takes the most number of decisions with the operational managers while the lower level admins are given the execution part. The management structure are inspired by the government ownership so they are slow to react to changes. The staffing is mainly done from school rather than other companies. The promotion in Chinese companies is slow but there is regular hike in salary. The employees lack in loyalty to the company and profession. The quality control is not up to the international standard in Chinese firms

USA

In United states of America these are few management principles that is followed in various firms. The rules and policies are made essentially by a group of individuals which is more centralised keeping in mind of the shareholders and stakeholders of the company where it is more focused on wealth maximization, once the choice has been made it is delegated to lower individuals

...

...

Download as:   txt (8.7 Kb)   pdf (48.8 Kb)   docx (11.9 Kb)  
Continue for 5 more pages »
Only available on ReviewEssays.com