Manorialism (mid-Evil Ages)
Essay by review • February 10, 2011 • Research Paper • 1,990 Words (8 Pages) • 1,104 Views
Rome did not, contrary to common belief, suddenly collapse - it had been
doing so for quite some time, accelerated by the invasion of the teutonic
tribes - but from a commonly accepted standpoint Rome collapsed in 476
AD.
In its collapse, almost all of the eastern [Western] empire fell along with any
attempt to restore it, while some of the elements from the western empire
never really faded. The structure of tribes that took the place of the Roman
centralized government consisted not only of the Visigoths who sacked
Rome in 410, the Vandals who attempted the same in 455, and the Goths,
there were other tribes who came during this period such as the Franks
under Clovis who established the Merovingian empire - named for Clovis's
father Merowig - . After Clovis' death he passed his kingdom on to his 4
sons, his land divided 4 ways, essentially making 4 different smaller
kingdoms all trying to control it all.
Under Merovingian kings counts and
knights were elected one way or another to assist the king, however in
hiring these counts and knights needed to be paid, and with no basic
currency they were given land. Of course this was a problem, as the king
kept hiring knights and counts for protection and help, and as they passed
thier given land onto there sons, the Merovingian kings power slowly
dissipated leading them to be known as the "Do Nothing Kings." Another
factor that may have led to their downfall was the hiring of the mayor of the
palace. This second in command was atsked with overseeing the kingdom
and the kings finances. With such control one could say that a mayor of a
palace was at the level of the king (though he would certainly never say it)
and in one instance actually overthrew the king, who was coincidently the
last of the Merovingian kings.
The next wave of kings were named the Carolingian kings. These kings
attempted to learn from there predecessors mistakes and fix the problem
of land distribution, however the solution only made the problem worse.
This solution - gavelkind - split the land in an inheritance form, equally,
after the king had died. This was the general reason for the downfall of the
Carolingian Empire.
Feudalism - the predominant social structure during the eleventh and
twelfth centuries - was a social structure strongly based on Land - which
determined your duties to be preformed, rights as a person, and status in
society - and the people you knew. Feudalism consisted of 2 acts that
constituted a feudal contract, one which was homage, and the other
investiture. In the first act of homage a tenant, in person, had to appear
before the lord he wished to have a contract with, as well as the lords
court. In the tenants appearance he kneeled before the lord and said an
oath, something along the lines of " I swear to be faithful and attached as
a man is to his lord"
After the homage came the part of the Lord in this ceremony known as
investiture. In this act the lord gave the tenant a sign of i suppose the
oath, saying that he in a sense belonged to that particular lord, much
like cattle branding.
The tenants land and agreement was often called a
fiefdom, or fief and was often recorded after the twelfth century. The fief
was a substantially vital part of the feudal system because with land
came power, and the more tenants a lord had, the more land he gained,
and therefore the more power he gained from such land. However the fief
was not the only way to hold land. Another way - though not extensively
used - was Allod. Allod was generally the same as a fief except that it
empowered complete ownership without any promises or conditions of
payment or service. Allod also required a written agreement. In a feudal
contract a lord had responsibilities to his vassal as the vassal (tenant) had
to his lord. Generally the lord supplied protection for his vassals, acted as
the judicial structure for his estate, and collected tax (which isn't really an
obligation of the lord to his tenant but the other way around) for the
upkeep of his estate and people, as well as for the estates defenses.
A
...
...