ReviewEssays.com - Term Papers, Book Reports, Research Papers and College Essays
Search

Nasa - Challenger Launch

Essay by   •  November 23, 2016  •  Essay  •  333 Words (2 Pages)  •  1,097 Views

Essay Preview: Nasa - Challenger Launch

Report this essay
Page 1 of 2

How would you characterize the broader context surrounding the January 1986 teleconference?

  • Engineers at Thiokol were sceptical about the launch of Challenger Space Shuttle at low temperatures; 20F
  • Conditions were not ideal for O-ring sealing component; could lead to erosion and blow-by
  • Flight-15 launched at 53F observed erosion
  • Biosjoly sent a memo to Bob Lund regarding in-efficiency of task forced formed regarding investigation of matter
  • Teleconference called over the security risk
  • Thiokol provided information to NASA about safety risk
  • NASA delayed launch from July 1985 to January 1986.
  • NASA under economic, political and scheduling backlog pressure
  • Teleconference called over increasing safety risk between NASA and Thiokol

What were the organizations in which they worked like?

  • Middle management did not inform the senior managers of the teleconference with the Thiokol, and potential problems with the O-ring – internal communication failure
  • NASA had developed a formal ‘waiver’ procedure – a procedure that allowed NASA personnel to ignore normal rules and procedures, when they needed to
  • NASA budget constraints
  • Thiokol did not provide sufficient concrete evidence
  • Individual vs Group decision by Biosjoly when he sent a memo Bob Lund
  • NASA reviewed the O-rings case by case rather than complete testing

What was the group against?

  • Communication breakdown between NASA and Thiokol
  • Thiokol side not prepared with concrete evidence
  • Internal communication failure within Thiokol
  • Lack of ownership for rectification of the critical issue relation to O-rings
  • Group pressure and lack of confidence in Thiokol over Biosjoly’s concerns
  • Ethics of NASA
  • NASA wanted success at any cost

What impact might that have on the group’s decision-making process?

  • Flawed group decision making progress
  • Thiokol did not provide strong evidence required to ground the launch
  • No support for Roger Boisjoly from within Thiokol when he erased concern over risk of O-rings
  • NASA under political and economic pressure to go ahead with launch
  • NASA wanted successful mission; did not focus on safety aspects
  • Thiokol under group pressure to surrender to NASA as they did not have substantial evidence against O-rings

...

...

Download as:   txt (2.3 Kb)   pdf (51.8 Kb)   docx (9.1 Kb)  
Continue for 1 more page »
Only available on ReviewEssays.com