No one Set of Age for Responsibility

No One Set of Age For Responsibility

There’s a line between adolescence and maturity. Some people view eighteen as an adult and others do not due to the word “teen”. But why should we as well regard twenty one as teens when Aristotle randomly chose the number because he believed when a person completed the 7 stages of youth developing. For this understanding, there shouldn't be a one set of age for responsibility because everybody doesn’t develop at a similar age or likewise. Why can't the age of responsibility follow one set of age ? Nowadays, teens face more cultural pressure than ever to grow up fast, in certain ways (Greenblatt 9). Alan Greenblatt says, “Executive thinking may not reach its peak until 25, but most people are capable of performing many adult functions adequately at an earlier age” (Greenblatt 21). Finding the true age of responsibility is complicated and almost impossible because it’s hard to pinpoint the exact age of responsibility since everybody is distinctive.

One's actual time of responsibility depends on the age, where they have completely developed. In “What is the Age of Responsibility?”, neuroscientists base that in most people, the prefrontal cortex and its link to other regions of the brain are not fully developed until age 25 (Greenblatt 5). However, in America, adulthood is set at eighteen and twenty-one (Greenblatt 6). But what is the substantial age of responsibility ? According to neuroscientists, and brain research, turning into an adult depends to a greater extent on the single brain.

No two individuals precisely develop in the same time, yet create at various rates. The fact that every person is different and develops at his own pace doesn’t make the creation of policy any easier (Greenblatt 22). The "Age of Responsibility", 21, is totally an arbitrary age, picked by a gather of men because twenty year olds aren’t fully trusted by mankind in general, which means they do not have a near charge per unit to have a widespread "Age of Responsibility as individuals.

At the point when lawmakers are making a conclusion for the age of responsibility, they’re not mostly thinking about adulthood, rather figure when a mind is completely created. The debate about drinking hinges on the question of whether the age of responsibility has been set too high (Greenblatt 15). Lowering the legal limit to eighteen would only mean pushing the drinking problem further down to sixteen to seventeen year old