Provide a Utilitarian Argument for Distributive Justice

Provide a utilitarian argument for distributive justice

The main question is “what is justice?”. The word of “justice” can be mean several numbers of things, like being fairness, equality, also having rights in the society. Distributive justice is about the fair allocation of resources among dividing members of society. Generally, fair allocation considers the total amount of goods to distributed. For this topic, philosophers have their own theories with their specific approaches. One of the approaches to the distributive justice is utilitarianism. The founder of utilitarianism is Jeremy Bentham and others argued that justice should be promoted utility to maximize pleasure in the absence of pain. Utilitarians tend to see the major difference between justice and morality. They see justice as a part of morality that do not have any other higher priority other moral concern. Utilitarian arguments of justice connect net happiness to law, economic distribution, politics. It means that we should discover the best pollical and economic system promote goodness in itself, goodness can be found in a happiness, flourishing or well-being. On the other hand, utilitarians especially advocate for social welfare because everyone’s well-being is a moral interest, and it is a good way to everyone flourishes to a minimal extent.

Moreover, the follower of utilitarian theory, James Stuart Mill says that “justice was a subset morality because injustice involves the violation of the rights, justice is not only about the right to do or wrong not to do, it is something person can argue from us as his moral right.” (J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism (1863). For instance, the best describe of “justice” is that people’s duty is to help to others. Why should we have a right? Rights are the laws of society that can make for everyone which could help people flourish and prosper, and people should believe that it would increase goodness in the long run. Mill’s conception of rights can be defined as positive (for food, medical care, education, shelter) and negative rights (to be allowed saying what we want or to have any religion). Both are right that can help people being better well-being. According to Mill, all people should have rights, laws, and political intervention in order to maximize the happiness, and minimize evil in the form of suffering. He believes that just is something that it is implied suffering harmful and