Source G Is an Extract Taken from a Novel. Is It Reliable as Evidence
Essay by review • February 27, 2011 • Essay • 464 Words (2 Pages) • 1,250 Views
Essay Preview: Source G Is an Extract Taken from a Novel. Is It Reliable as Evidence
Source G is an extract taken from a Novel. Is it reliable as evidence
about evacuees?
Explain your answer using Source G and knowledge from your studies.
The first factor to support its unreliability is that as a Novel the
characters and story are fiction. However, through research it is
known that the writer Nina Bawden was evacuated in 1939 at the age of
14. Therefore, all events, emotions and surroundings have come from
personal experience and are reflected in the Novel. Therefore, the
books content must be reliable. However, the characters are works of
fiction and from the short extract, we know very little about the
characters previous lives and through what circumstances they arrived
here.
Nevertheless, when understanding and considering the word Novel, it is
assumed that the story may stray away from the facts, as to accumulate
more readers. However, it is moreover understood that the book is
there for the younger generation to understand and conceive what it
would be like to be in that situation. The book would not meander away
from the true heart and emotions of the true story of evacuation. On
the other hand, the story is written by only one woman and therefore
the source is only looking at evacuation from one perspective.
Another factor affecting the reliability is that she wrote the book in
1973, 34 years since she had been evacuated. Emotions and facts could
have become vague over that long period and the way she wrote could
have reflected the sorrowful or morose experiences during evacuation.
The context of the source can also indicate whether the source is
reliable. From previous studies, it is known that there
...
...