Technical Memorandum

MEMORANDUM TO: Mrs. Julie Smith - Customer Care Services Manager

FROM: John Doe - Customer Care Services Supervisor

DATE: March 7, 2006

SUBJECT: Integrating Brio (CC Analyzer) and CentreVu Databases

This memorandum presents a description of the current situation, a few proposed alternatives, and my recommendations. The goal is to establish a single standard database management reporting system across both call centers of the CSO (Customer Service Operations) Network & Enterprise Division. CCS (Customer Care Services) currently uses a reporting system called CC Analyzer (a form of BRIO) that was adopted by the department in March of 2004. SSC (System Support Center) currently uses a reporting system called CentreVu Supervisor (a Lucent Enterprise application) that was adopted by both call centers in June of 1998.

The purpose of this memorandum is to analyze the utilization of both reporting system by management, technical department, scheduler, and others that may use these tools as a form or monitoring service levels, running historical data, or measuring data for business and individual goals. Both applications are loaded and available for use on everyone's computer, however there is an insignificant amount of training to utilize these tools to its full potential. Based on my knowledge of the two systems, I use one of the databases to run log in log out reports, and I use the other database to run how many calls an agent took in one hour but both of these reports can be ran through each database system. CC Analyzer & CentreVu Supervisor can perform 87% of same functionalities but due to lack of training and "Learn as you go" on the job, most of these tools will never be used for its complete intended use. Based on feedback from other end users, 50% of the systems tools are never utilized. Motorola is paying contractors $400 a month for maintenance, upgrades, and tech support for each application. In effort to save Motorola money and generate consistency across all level of end users, the department needs to re-evaluate the use of having one verse two database management systems.

A task team has been assigned to analyze CC Analyzer & CentreVu Supervisor to determine which database management system will benefit the department and meet all the needs of the company's shareholders. This task was clearly focused on how efficient the systems are used today. In addition to efficiency, the team will check the accuracy and consistency (or lack of) of data, and the use of real time metrics. Furthermore, the task team has looked into the amount of training that is needed for each system, and how much it would cost the department for each individual to attend these training sessions.

After months of collecting data, the findings were favorable towards utilizing CentreVu Supervisor over using CC Analyzer as the department's primary source of CCO's database management reporting system. Listed will support the decision that was made by the group broken down by some of the key advantages and disadvantages of each system:

CentreVu Supervisor advantages

a) Real time data for agent's current state for availability to take calls

b) Log in Log out reports

c) Ability