The Rwandan Genocide
Essay by review • December 8, 2010 • Essay • 1,914 Words (8 Pages) • 1,509 Views
The Rwandan Genocide
History has a funny way of repeating itself. After World War II, the United States and the rest of the international community promised to do all they could to prevent future genocides. However this was a promise they were unable to keep. In 1994 when Rwanda went through genocide the United States and U.N were absent, leaving the Tutsis to be brutally murdered by the Hutus. As a consequence 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were killed and dumped into mass graves. Once again the United States and U.N promised to do more, but this time it was too late.
Before the genocide, Rwanda existed as a country the size of Vermont with a population of 8 million. Rwanda was controlled by Belgium, who gained control of the country from a League of Nations mandate that took the control of Rwanda away from Germany and gave it to Belgium. Under the Belgian control from 1919 to 1962 the Tutsis experienced privileges that were denied to the Hutus. The Belgians designated the Tutsis to be the select group of privileged and educated intermediaries between the governed and the governor because they were landowners who were tall and in the European eyes "aristocratic looking".
Rwanda's path towards independence from Belgium started with the influence of European colonial powers and missionaries. The European colonial powers introduced modern weapons and methods for waging war. The European missionaries also reminded the Rwandans of their oppression and instigated feelings of revolution. In 1956, using their new knowledge from the European colonial powers, the Hutus began their quest for independence by rebelling and fighting. By 1959 the Hutus had seized power and began stripping the Tutsis of their land. In response, the Tutsis fled to neighboring countries and formed the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF).
In 1962, when Rwanda gained its independence from Belgium, the Hutu took control of the government. Under Hutu control in Rwanda Tutsi's privileges were stripped; they were no longer allowed to go to secondary schools and universities. In 1990 RPF (Rwandan Patriotic Front) rebels attacked and civil war began. In 1993 the U.N and other western powers stepped in and achieved a cease-fire. They set up a power sharing agreement known as the Arusha Accords, which forced the Rwandan government to govern with Hutu opposition parties and a Tutsi minority. The U.N also stationed peacekeepers to insure exiled Tutsi that it would be safe to return to their homes. However not everyone was happy with the Arusha Accord. Hutu extremists felt that they had nothing to gain from the peace agreement and a lot to loose. The Hutu extremists who had opposed the Arusha Accord were already getting ready for the genocide, "By 1992, Hutu militia had purchased, stockpiled, and begun distributing an estimated 85 tons of munitions, as well as 581,000 machetes, one machete for every 1/3 adult Hutu male."(Power 337)
Even though the Rwandan genocide started suddenly, there were many warning signs that both the United States and the U.N should have noticed. In 1993, a peace group known as the international commission of investigation spent 3 weeks in Rwanda, interviewing many Rwandans about reported mass murders of Tutsis. "The commission's March 1993 report found that more than 10,000 Tutsis had been detained and 2,000 murdered since the RPF's invasion in 1990."(Power 338). The international commission and U.N rapportuer warned of the probability of a large-scale genocide (Power 338). As though this in it self was not enough evidence towards the inevitable genocide, the CIA released a report in January of 1993 warning against the probability of a large-scale ethnic violence (Power 338). Despite all of these warning signals both the United States and the U.N did little to stop the pending genocide.
On April 6th, 1994 Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana's Jet was shot down, killing him and Burundi President Cyprien Ntaryamira. This officially started the Genocide in Rwanda. Immediately after the plane was shot down Hutu militia and government soldiers announced a curfew and put up roadblocks around the capital. The Rwandan Armed Forces (FAR) and the Hutu militia known as the Interahamwe then went from house to house killing Tutsis and moderate Hutu politicians. U.N peacekeeping forces known as the UNAMIR (United Nations Assistance Mission in Rwanda) stood by as the slaughter went on as they were forbidden to intervene, because it would breach their "monitoring" mandate. The next day on April 7th , 1994 ten Belgian soldiers with UNAMIR, who were assigned to guard the moderate Hutu prime minister Uwilingiymana, were tricked into giving up their weapons and were brutally tortured and murdered along with Uwilingiymana. On April 9th, 1994, France and Belgium sent troops to rescue their citizens; American Citizens were also airlifted out. However no Rwandans were rescued, not even those who were employed by western governments.
The Hutus were very brutal and efficient in killing the Tutsis. They broadcasted their hit lists of victims including their names, addresses and license plate numbers. Those who heard their name on the radio fled their homes because they knew if they stayed they would be killed. In the beginning, the Hutu were well-equipped militiamen who used grenades and guns to peruse their mission. In the countryside the Hutus initially used firearms, but when more and more Hutus joined in the killings, the weapons became more barbaric. The weapons changed from grenades and guns to knives, machetes, spears and the masu which was a bulky club with nails . Prior to the Genocide, Hutus and Tutsis were intermarried, worked and socialized together. Now Tutsi victims had to deal with the threat of being killed by their friends, coworkers or even relatives. Many Hutu men and women had to make the decision whether or not to stay with their Tutsi spouse and be killed or flee .
The United States' reactions towards the genocide in Rwanda showed that they did not uphold their promise to help prevent future genocides. The United States made it clear that they would only get involved militarily, if there was a zero percent risk of confrontation. An example of this is the PDD-25, signed by President Clinton on May 3, 1994, or Clinton's Presidential Decision Directive that aimed to limit United States military involvement in international peacekeeping operations. Another example of the United States being unwilling to act is when the U.S argued about the cost of the U.N's request to provide 50 armored personnel carriers.
...
...