Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism could be summed up by the phrase "the greatest happiness for the greatest number." The idea was first coined by Francis Hutcheson (1694- 1746) who wrote a book called "An inquiry into the original of our ideas of beauty and virtue" Although strictly speaking he is not a Utilitarian; he laid down the very basic ideas of this theory. The theory of utility is later on put forward by David Hume a Scottish philosopher. As a consequentialist Hume believed that is not the action but rather the action is of the best interest of ours or others; despite of his ideas, Hume is not considered as a Utilitarian.

It was Jeremy Bentham who articulated the very first scheme of Utilitarianism. He simply put forward this very idea "the greatest sum of pleasure and the least sum of pain for the greatest sum of people." The way which this was measured was through the application of the Hedonic calculus, which included the following seven criteria: intensity, duration, certainty, extent, remoteness, richness and purity. And one should apply these criteria when faced with a dilemma. In order to apply Bentham's theory every single criteria must be considered, in order to reach the intention of utility. According to Bentham's theory, the pleasure derived from a junkie's pleasure in shooting up is equal to the pleasure of one watching a Shakespeare play. Of course this theory is a pure consequentialist theory which means it does not apply any basic rules or bottom lines.

Many people would later on criticize this theory as quantitative measure, which means that an action is justified through the sheer quantity of pleasure that is gained from the action. Therefore a philosopher came up with an improved version of Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill measures Utilitarianism through a qualitative measure; he believed that there are two kinds of pleasure, higher pleasure which is associated with the mind and lower pleasure which is associated with the body. He believed that high pleasure (such as literature, music and love) should always be preferred to lower pleasure (such as eating, clothing and sex). He once quoted "It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied." (J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism) The pleasure in which a fool indulges is discredited, because of the very own essence of the activity, whilst Socrates' activities are automatically made more laudable.

Today Utilitarianism could be outlined in two different ways:

Act Utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism. Act Utilitarianism which basically means the action is only justified by the end means, the greatest happiness for the greatest number, with only the guidelines of J.S. Mill and Bentham's ideas. On the other hand Rule Utilitarianism wishes to achieve the same goal but framed by general principles or rules, where specific acts are not permitted. Many modern Scholars would identify more with Rule Utilitarianism, such as W.D. Ross. He believed that the theory of Utilitarianism is hard to apply to a real life ethical dilemma, and the difficulty to apply a single factor moral theory, and that some rules must be applied.

Utilitarianism is a theory which is applied through various different methods, but its strength and witnesses would be illustrated in the next question.

3

Examine the strengths and the weaknesses of Utilitarianism

There is an undoubted weakness with all teleological theories, which dig straight to the roots of the very theology- and that is the sheer reliance on the calculation of consequences. Together with other teleological theories Utilitarianism could not avoid the countless consequences that the very action may face. Besides theological theories relies on a sheer prediction, but the consequences of a situation could not be certain, until the very action have been carried out. And one could not rely on past experiences either, because as most people would realize that the same action could end up in myriad consequences. If a murder was committed, and the victim were