Western Imperialism

Nonetheless, it is an overgeneralization to commit to the statement, as national sovereignty is still very much relevant in today's context. Countries affected by globalization still have control over state affairs and policies, unlike that of Western Imperialism in the past. For instance, in the 1980s, socialist Burma and Vietnam had closed their doors to international trade through adoption of a 'closed economy'. Furthermore, it is obvious that the global economy and international relations today are upheld by interdependency between nations, in order to benefit mutually. Thus, it is safe to conclude that globalization is not imperialism repackaged, but a showcase of Western influence over global issues. hdyh ye utiti euyeye5 urturu yty ydr srytuy eurs sey5 y u rtyry srtery Nonetheless, it is an overgeneralization to commit to the statement, as national sovereignty is still very much relevant in today's context. Countries affected by globalization still have control over state affairs and policies, unlike that of Western Imperialism in the past. For instance, in the 1980s, socialist Burma and Vietnam had closed their doors to international trade through adoption of a 'closed economy'. Furthermore, it is obvious that the global economy and international relations today are upheld by interdependency between nations, in order to benefit mutually. Thus, it is safe to conclude that globalization is not imperialism repackaged, but a showcase of Western influence over global issues.