Essay on Convergance Culture and Trends of Music Sharing online
Essay by review • February 21, 2011 • Research Paper • 1,470 Words (6 Pages) • 1,459 Views
Essay Preview: Essay on Convergance Culture and Trends of Music Sharing online
Using an illustrative case study from the Web (site, application, event, etc.), analyze and discuss the significance of what Henry Jenkins calls �convergence culture’. Make specific reference to two or three of the major areas of tension he identifies as shaping the contemporary media environment.
Significant innovations have occurred across the business or intermediate services sectors and the domestic or consumer service sectors, across the fields of entertainment, communication, and information sharing and the website that I am using for my case study is one of them. Imeem.com is a unique file sharing social networking site where individuals pool their time, experience, wisdom, resources, and creativity to form new information, knowledge, and cultural goods. Drawing from Henry Jenkins work I will focus on how the website is redesigning the digital economy, renegotiating relations between producers and consumers and reengaging the citizens.
In 2007 the four largest record companies in the world Universal, Warner Music Group, Sony BMG and EMI, signing a deal with Imeem allowing the domain to feature content of the artists signed by the record companies legally. Meaning that, Imeem was now the first website whose users had the music industry's blessing, to share music for free in return for a cut of advertising revenues from the website.
It seemed that both Imeem and the music industry had learnt immensely from the Napster incident.
Imeem was founded by Dalton Calwell (ex-VA Linux) and Jan Jannink (formerly of Napster) and many of the core engineers came from the original Napster file sharing service. It maybe for this reason that their is a significant difference between Napster and Imeem. Which is while Imeem only allows you to upload and play music on its website, Napster allowed its users to download songs onto their hard drive.
For the music industry all that the Napster incident accomplished was to drive file-sharing underground where the recording industry couldn't get a cut of the profits. Had they approached Napster in 2000 the way they approached Imeem, they could have been collecting ad revenue from every file-sharing transaction over the last eight years. Instead, they wasted a lot of money on lawsuits, angered a lot of their customers, and ultimately had to concede that music sharing might be OK as long as they get a cut.
For fairly obvious reasons, we usually think of such networks, which began with Napster, as a “problem”. This is because such networks were initially overwhelmingly used to perform an act that, by the analysis of almost any legal scholar, was copyright infringement. And although Imeem does not allow it users to download music for free, it does go against the fundamental principle of a record labels' business strategy that sharing music without paying for it is stealing. But since the successful collaboration of 2007 the rigid music industry is letting go of old ideas and is converging in order to produce new paradigms for both the industry and the consumer. This has not only aided in redesigning the digital economy but it has also helped renegotiate relations between producers and consumers. Imeem's CEO, Dalton Caldwell, has argued that the record industry needs to let go of the notion that music should be the main revenue driver and instead focus on an advertising-based model like radio and television do. Although it might seem naÐ"Їve but free services such as Imeem based on the advertising model offer a glimpse of a radical future in which one may not need to purchase music anymore, with the product being supplied for free and legally online.
Now, I concede that the vision of the future I’ve suggested maybe too radical to actually come true but there is another, more likely possibility that can occur which is the lowering of costs of the final product. This can be possible because it is in principle possible to bypass publishers, packagers, and programmers, and to make content directly available across networks on the Internet. New technologies of media content distribution arising from digitization, convergence, and networking can eliminate the gatekeeper role played by distributors and other intermediaries, allowing for a more direct commercial relationship between the content creators and their audiences/ consumers.
Like any distributed computing projects such as peer-to-peer file sharing networks, Imeem is an excellent example of a highly efficient system for storing and accessing data in a computer network. In addition, the site offers a platform for simple connectedness and mutual companionship, by offering the user forums to discuss various issues and by allowing the user to form groups. The broader point to take from looking at Imeem or any other peer-to-peer file sharing network, however, is the sheer effectiveness of large scale collaboration among individuals. By cooperating in these sharing practices, users construct together systems with capabilities far exceeding those that they could have developed by themselves, as well as the capabilities that even the best financed corporations could provide. The network components owned by any single music delivery service cannot match the collective storage and retrieval capabilities of a universe of users, hard drives and network connections. Domains like Imeem provide important lessons about the extent to which large-scale collaboration among strangers or loosely affiliated users can provide effective access to a broad range of materials which otherwise would be hard if not next to impossible. This is an example of how the citizens are engaging themselves in the new era
...
...